4. Financing for Municipal Services including Public TransitMunicipalities, large and small (444 in Ontario with 99% of the population), are chronically short of the funds required to provide the services that are their responsibility, including public and active transit, and transition to low carbon forms of energy in time to meet their own and Canada’s climate emissions goals. Municipalities are not constitutional entities like the federal and provincial governments. They are created and governed by the Provinces and Territories and limited in the sources of revenue they are authorised to raise (primarily from property taxes and user/service fees such as transit fares). They do not have direct access to revenue from sales or income taxes. They are therefore constant supplicants for cash transfers from the provincial and federal governments. The result is a Sisyphean budgeting nightmare that often results in policies that undercut the transition to cleaner healthier transit options. Exactly one year ago, the Progressive Conservative Government of Ontario found more than $1 billion for a rebate of licence plate fees for Ontario’s 8.3 million drivers. If that $1 billion had been spent on public transit instead, fares could have been lowered, rapid bus service lanes could have been increased, LRT projects could have been completed - and we could have moved toward the active transit infrastructure needed in our communities. The Toronto Environmental Alliance is tackling the funding issue. They propose a 6.25 cents per hour levy on non-residential commercial parking. It would generate $575 million per year to help fund the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC), equivalent l to a quarter of its current budget. Breaking News! During the budget meeting on Wednesday, February 15, Toronto City Council voted to have the city staff do a feasibility study of the proposal. But Councillors should not ignore road tolls that drivers pay directly. They can be made more politically palatable by dedicating the funds raised to the same corridors as the tolled roads/highways. Doing so changes behaviour - many switch to public transit - they were only driving because they had no alternative. Transit Fares Free Transit advocates have ample research to show that low or no fares for public transit are the most effective way to increase ridership, increase accessibility for low-income residents and reduce the use of private cars and trucks on the roads with all the environmental benefits that entails. Read “The Case for Free Public Transportation” published in July 2022 in The Toronto Star. Toronto City Council’s current TTC budget proposals call for fare increases and service cuts - measures that reduce the use of public transit and increase the number of cars on Toronto streets, with negative consequences for GHG emissions and noise pollution, not to mention the health effects of childhood asthma and the 6,500 deaths from air pollution in Ontario a year. The Fair Pass system Toronto introduced in 2016 for low-income residents is only slightly increased this year and is still not fully funded. By contrast, the Town of Orangeville has started a Fare-Free Transit pilot program. Lack of attention and funding for social services, from mental health, to homelessness, disability and welfare supports, have turned the public transit system into “part of Toronto’s shelter network” for highly vulnerable people subject to preying criminals, thus undermining safe and reliable transit, its primary function. Watch the speakers at this February 9th townhall held by TTC Riders speak to this issue. The anxiety induced by these social service deficits is impairing our health and that of our transit systems. Providing social crisis services for riders and making fares free will lower riders’ anxiety level and may reduce theft and violence. Service funding cuts are not the answer! The solution? Reliable, long term financing from the Provincial and/or Federal Government and/or a legislated portion of sales or income taxes. In the longer term, cities, municipalities and Indigenous nations must have seats at the table through constitutional reform. |